[squeak-dev] Monticello and PackageInfo
Colin Putney
colin at wiresong.com
Thu Apr 4 16:44:06 UTC 2013
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:36 PM, David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:
> So for me it is important that a class can belong to more than one package.
>
Me too. I've used this feature while splitting monolithic packages into
multiple packages that can be loaded independently, not to manage a
mistake, but to make the process easier as I went.
I've also used it when developing tools like Monticello and OmniBrowser.
The tests inevitably involve making code changes, and I've found it handy
to have a sub-package containing only those bogus classes that get changed
by the tests. When things don't get cleaned up properly because of broken
tests or tools, I can fix things by just loading the sub-package to revert
all changes.
Colin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20130404/768b9867/attachment.htm
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|