Yes, but that didn't happen in the last 24 hours did it? Because
that's the time difference between the two builds.

Or do you mean that your decompilation fixes plus my Compiler
recompileAll resulted in not creating "bad" stuff in the new
updated-from-4.4 image?

frank

On 17 April 2013 13:57, Nicolas Cellier
<nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, as I already said, I corrected the decompiler to be in line with the
> modification of Compiler by Eliot, and the recompilation of the system "fait
> monter la mayonnaise" (sorry, no time to dig for an english translation).
>
>
> 2013/4/17 Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com>
>>
>> I don't usually complain about tests passing, but in this case tests
>> have passed that used to fail, but not because of code changes.
>>
>> http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/272/testReport/ shows failures
>> in decompiling and method highlighting that don't exist in
>> http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/273/testReport/
>>
>> The difference? I rebuilt the image under test: 273's image is
>> 4.4-12327 updated to trunk, run through the release process [1] and
>> then shrunk [2].
>>
>> I _imagine_ the forced recompilation of everything is what's made the
>> tests pass?
>>
>> frank
>>
>> [1]
>> Form openAsBackground: (FileDirectory default / '..' /
>> 'resources/wallpaper.png') pathName.
>> Workspace allInstances do: [:w | w topView delete].
>> ReleaseBuilderFor4dot5 prepareNewBuild. "this calls Compiler recompileAll"
>> Smalltalk snapshot: true andQuit: true.
>>
>>
>> [2]
>> #('39Deprecated' '311Deprecated' '45Deprecated' 'Nebraska' 'Universes'
>> 'XML-Parser') do: [ :pkgName |
>>     (MCPackage named: pkgName) unload.
>>     MCMcmUpdater disableUpdatesOfPackage: pkgName].
>>
>> Smalltalk cleanUp.
>>
>
>
>
>