[squeak-dev] re: would it be fun to implement Squeak (and SPOON!) on this hardware?

Bob Hartwig bobjects at gmail.com
Tue Dec 24 03:18:14 UTC 2013


Why not program the BBB's bare metal?  Too much error-prone hassle to
initialize everything?

    Bob




On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 7:17 PM, tim Rowledge <tim at rowledge.org> wrote:

>
> On 23-12-2013, at 4:00 PM, Jon Hylands <jon at huv.com> wrote:
>
> > The real win over the Beaglebone Black (I have one of those too) is that
> there is no complication of the OS, and it boots instantly when you turn on
> the power. You're working on the metal, which can be fun in some cases.
>
> Run RISC OS. It’s about as close to bare metal as you can get and still
> have a helpful OS around to start from. Unlike unixy OSs it lets you get
> straight to the metal; no ring 0 authorisation hoops to jump through.
>
>
> tim
> --
> tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
> Trojan:  Storage device for replicating codes...
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20131223/2e3d075c/attachment.htm


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list