[squeak-dev] Re: OmniBrowser + OCompletion in Squeak 4.3 / 4.4 ?
And Cacophony of Package Systems ...
H. Hirzel
hannes.hirzel at gmail.com
Wed Feb 20 11:24:54 UTC 2013
But we are digressing.
I loaded OmniBrowser into 4.4 in December
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2012-December/166810.html
The question is now how to add OCompletion.
--Hannes
On 2/20/13, H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com> wrote:
> Tobias,
>
> helpful chart to get the big picture.
> Thank you.
>
> --Hannes
>
> P.S. How would the Java row look like? :-)
>
> On 2/20/13, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
>> Am 20.02.2013 um 11:30 schrieb Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> On 20 February 2013 02:48, Chris Muller <ma.chris.m at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Thanks for the note John. I hope you don't mind if I cc the
>>>> squeak-dev list in my reply.
>>> […]
>>
>> Here is my not too serious comparison chart for The Things to Load Code.
>>
>> Pkg install frontend Package manager Version management Repository
>> -------+-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+---------------------
>> Squeak SqueakMap Metacello Monticello SqueakSource/Smalltalkhub
>> Python pip eggs ? (eg) hg (eg) bitbucket
>> JS npm npm (eg) git (eg) GitHub
>> GLASS (Metacello api) Metacello Monticello GitHub/Squeaksource3
>> Debian aptitude dpkg / /
>>
>> All four categories are necessary and serve very different purposes.
>> Note this list is only examples. Note that there may(and should) be
>> certain
>> overlaps
>> the farther right you get.
>>
>> Best
>> -Tobias
>>
>>
>>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|