[squeak-dev] Re: OmniBrowser + OCompletion in Squeak 4.3 / 4.4 ? And Cacophony of Package Systems ...

H. Hirzel hannes.hirzel at gmail.com
Wed Feb 20 11:24:54 UTC 2013


But we are digressing.

I loaded OmniBrowser into 4.4 in December

http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2012-December/166810.html

The question is now how to add OCompletion.

--Hannes

On 2/20/13, H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com> wrote:
> Tobias,
>
> helpful chart to get the big picture.
> Thank you.
>
> --Hannes
>
> P.S. How would the Java row look like?  :-)
>
> On 2/20/13, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
>> Am 20.02.2013 um 11:30 schrieb Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> On 20 February 2013 02:48, Chris Muller <ma.chris.m at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Thanks for the note John.  I hope you don't mind if I cc the
>>>> squeak-dev list in my reply.
>>> […]
>>
>> Here is my not too serious comparison chart for The Things to Load Code.
>>
>> 	Pkg install frontend	Package manager		Version management	Repository
>> -------+-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+---------------------
>> Squeak	SqueakMap		Metacello		Monticello		SqueakSource/Smalltalkhub
>> Python	pip			eggs ?			(eg) hg			(eg) bitbucket
>> JS	npm			npm			(eg) git		(eg) GitHub
>> GLASS	(Metacello api)		Metacello		Monticello		GitHub/Squeaksource3
>> Debian	aptitude		dpkg			/			/
>>
>> All four categories are necessary and serve very different purposes.
>> Note this list is only examples. Note that there may(and should) be
>> certain
>> overlaps
>> the farther right you get.
>>
>> Best
>> 	-Tobias
>>
>>
>>
>


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list