[squeak-dev] Mantis usage rules du jour

Casey Ransberger casey.obrien.r at gmail.com
Sat Feb 23 04:57:34 UTC 2013


Actually Mantis is probably dead. The place to report bugs is presently
here. The bug tracker, as far as I can tell, is presently unloved.

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Colin Putney <colin at wiresong.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>>  Mostly we do the wrong thing, which is commit directly to trunk or,
>> slightly less wrong, commit an mcz to the Inbox (MCHttpRepository
>> location: 'http://source.squeak.org/inbox' user: '' password: '').
>>
>> So _I_ favour a bug report to Mantis
>> (http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7740 right?), and if it's small,
>> just commit it to trunk and record that in the tracker. (I find it
>> really, really useful to see the audit trail in Mantis. It might be
>> seriously ugly, but it beats an inbox every day.)
>>
>
> The Inbox is meant for changes that need review—either contributions from
> developers without direct access to the trunk, or from core developers that
> would like a second set of eyes on the code before it goes into trunk. So,
> sure, a Mantis entry is great, but core developers putting stuff in the
> Inbox ought to be fairly rare. The idea is to keep it easy to contribute,
> with minimal ceremony.
>
> Colin
>
>
>
>


-- 
Casey Ransberger
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20130222/bcc80500/attachment.htm


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list