> From: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org [mailto:squeak-dev-
> bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Bert Freudenberg
> Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 1:22 PM
> 
> On 23.02.2013, at 19:02, Colin Putney <colin at wiresong.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > Mantis might appear less dead if reports/changes got posted to
squeak-
> dev. Thoughts?
> >>
> >> The reason it doesn't already do this is just that I didn't want to
annoy
> everyone. I think it's a great idea. What granularity ought to apply?
Mails on
> new issues? State changes (to see when something's resolved)?
> >>
> >> Yeah, great idea. I'd say send messages for both, with a [Bugs] tag for
easy
> filtering.
> >
> > Colin
> 
> +1 for [Bugs] because short.
> 
> - Bert -
> 

Bugs is good because of bugs.squeak.org and mantis does come from bug.  I
thought about bugs first but was thinking that we don't use mantis to
document bugs only.  We use it for new code, for making changes to working
code and such.  It works fine for me but I wonder if the name would prevent
some people from using it, or would it cause some confusion.  

[Squeak-dev] should really be [commits].  Maybe [Bugs] should be [changes]
or [discuss].

Ron
> 
>