Let's consider changing how we track issues (was Re: [squeak-dev] Mantis usage rules du jour)

karl ramberg karlramberg at gmail.com
Sun Feb 24 19:51:10 UTC 2013


I'm no expert on SqueakSource3, maybe there is someone who have deeper
knowledge that can share ?


On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Ken Causey <ken at kencausey.com> wrote:

> On 02/23/2013 05:15 PM, karl ramberg wrote:
>
>> I see SqueakSource3 has a Issues category per package.
>>
>> For example:
>> http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/**dgg.html/Issues<http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/dgg.html/Issues>
>>
>> Karl
>>
>
> Nice, thanks for pointing that out.  There has been some discussion of
> setting up a SqueakSource3 instance as an upgrade to source.squeak.orgbut I think the consensus is that it is not ready yet to support all of the
> Monticello capabilities we currently use, I'm not sure of the details.
>
> Can you collect some details about how the Issue tracking works, for
> example whether there is support for sending email to a specific email
> address for every new issue or each time an issue is updated?  Also is it
> up to handling hundreds or even thousands of issues?
>
> I created an account and considered creating a temporary project for
> evaluation purposes.  But I'm holding off because I don't want to create
> such a project and then find that I can't easily delete it and pollute the
> project list.
>
> Ken
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20130224/db930a27/attachment.htm


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list