On 26 February 2013 09:10, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 26 February 2013 07:43, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
>> Am 26.02.2013 um 08:28 schrieb Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> On 26 February 2013 07:23, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
>>>> Am 26.02.2013 um 08:19 schrieb Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> On 26 February 2013 06:38, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, it should, but without the .mcz you'd end up loading
>>>>> WebClient-Core-ar.921.mcz by accident, were there such a version.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Then I would like to declare Installer broken. ;)
>>>> Rephrased: This would be unexpected behavior for me
>>>
>>> If you raise a bug I'll remember to fix it :) Otherwise my
>>> disease-riddled brain will likely forget.
>>
>>
>> you mean on mantis?
>> To be frank, I have no idea how to.
>> I find mantis most puzzeling :/
>
> Really? It's very retro chic, but I've always found its interface to
> be more or less navigable. It _has_ been a very long time since I
> learned Mantis though, to be fair.
>
> So I raised the ticket for you: http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7742

Bert, while InstallerMonticello has always behaved this way, you
touched this (InstallerMonticello >> #mcDetectFileBlock:) last -
before I rip out its guts, are there any gotchas I might miss? Is it
_desirable_ to match 'Collections-fbs.489' when trying to install
'Collections-fbs.48'?

> frank
>
>> Best
>>         -tobias
>>