OB is working (was: Re: [squeak-dev] problem with Omnibrowser and Refactoring engine)

Tobias Pape Das.Linux at gmx.de
Tue Feb 26 10:06:05 UTC 2013


Am 26.02.2013 um 10:36 schrieb Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com>:

> On 26 February 2013 06:42, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
>> Am 26.02.2013 um 06:30 schrieb Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de>:
>> 
>>> Am 25.02.2013 um 21:37 schrieb Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com>:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks, I'll look into it.
>>> (it worked form me because I had it in my package-cache)
>>> 
>> 
>> Ok, this is fixed now.
>> 
>> and
>> 
>> Installer ss
>>      project: 'MetacelloRepository';
>>      install: 'ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser'.
>> ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser) project version: #stable) load: #('Dev')
>> 
>> Now works as expected.
>> I tested it in a vanilla Squeak 4.4-12327
> 
> Thanks, Tobias. That works great!
> 
> This would make a good script for a (head) release on SqueakMap for
> OmniBrowser. Colin?
> 
> (It's not quite the same as OmniBrowser 2.0.4's script, which uses
> #lastVersion (and it really should pin the version).)
> 
> Given a head release, I'm happy to set up the CI job...


Head would be better to use the #bleedingEdge version, I think.
let me test… No. 
  Currently, the #stable version is pinned to what _I_ called
1.2.4.1 [1], but the #bleedingEdge uses the latest baseline, 
which is the there defined 1.4 baseline.

-> for now, please use #stable :)

The proper way now would be to define a 2.0 baseline which loads
Lukas’ part (Polymorph) for Pharo and Colin’s  part for Squeak
(Toolbuilder).

Lukas, Colin, if you are listening, would that be about right?

Best
	-Tobias


[1] What would be the proper version? Given Colins numbering (2.0.4)
    would it be 2.0.5 or 2.1?




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list