I say completely scrap the idea of an all-in-one download for releases.
The three times bigger download size and added complexity of building the all-in-one isn't worth any effort IMHO for the three people somehwere that might want to run on more than one platform. Any interested parties are certain to be able to easily pick their appropriate platform download.

Concentrating on making sure the downloads for separate platforms have the Readmes, image, changes, sources and VM, and being a pleasant first experience is important however.

Ken G. Brown

On 2013-01-09, at 12:40 PM, Chris Muller wrote:

> Heh, thanks for looking for a way to automate it.  BTW I just meant,
> "manually update the newly desired components in the zip" including
> readme's, VM, etc.  Not just the image..  :)
> 
> Speaking of... which VM DO we want in the All-In-One?  I'm thinking
> with the new Cog, since seems to be stable enough and it can launch
> old images too..
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
>> That's a sad possibility though: it means folks run an ancient VM, and an untested VM+image combo.
>> 
>> We have to figure out how to do this anyway so I'm trying to get us to bite the bullet sooner rather than later.
>> 
>> frank
>> 
>> On 09 Jan 2013, at 16:42, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Not sure if you got it going Frank, but a possible alternative if this
>>> one is difficult would possibly be to simply copy the All-In-One.zip
>>> for 4.3, and then replace the image inside the zip and call it done..?
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Ah. Well, actually.
>>>> 
>>>> There's a <data> tag on line 119 of a file [1]. It looks like it's b64
>>>> encoded. What's it contain? What makes it?
>>>> 
>>>> What process did you follow to make that particular commit?
>>>> 
>>>> frank
>>>> 
>>>> [1] https://github.com/renggli/builder/commit/613716ee3e23692b98abbeec6def1a703ad6f3a4
>>>> 
>>>> On 7 January 2013 20:55, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Ah, that's _exactly_ what I'm looking for. Thanks, Dale!
>>>>> 
>>>>> frank
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 7 January 2013 17:42, Dale Henrichs <dhenrich at vmware.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Frank,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Take a look at Lukas' builder[1] project for an example of building one-clicks...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Dale
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/renggli/builder
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> | From: "Frank Shearar" <frank.shearar at gmail.com>
>>>>>> | To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers list" <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>>>>>> | Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 7:11:21 AM
>>>>>> | Subject: [squeak-dev] All-in-ones
>>>>>> |
>>>>>> | Who knows how to make one of these?
>>>>>> |
>>>>>> | I'm more than happy to automate the process, but I don't know what
>>>>>> | the
>>>>>> | process is yet!
>>>>>> |
>>>>>> | frank
>>>>>> |
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>