On 9 January 2013 20:54, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
> The best way is to test it is on your own machine.  Do you have access
> to the server?
>
> In /home/squeakmap is the server image -- Squeak3.8-6665-sm.image.
> Grab it and the changes as well as  "start.st" boots the server in the
> same directory (note a classic VM is required).  Running it on your
> localhost so can actually step through debugger in the server to make
> sure the change works.
>
> This is how I did the 2011 enhancements for the Release Editor and CSP
> improvements.
>
> Doing this will also bring to light how badly we really need to
> improve or replace SqueakMap's implementation, particularly on the
> server side.  :(   The domain model itself is actually pretty nice,
> but the machinery needs improvement.

I don't have access to the box, but setting up a test server sounds
like an excellent idea.

Otherwise, I could always practice on one of my packages. Hm, maybe
not: fooling around might crash stuff.

frank

> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 9 January 2013 12:55,  <commits at source.squeak.org> wrote:
>>> Frank Shearar uploaded a new version of SMLoader to project The Inbox:
>>> http://source.squeak.org/inbox/SMLoader-fbs.78.mcz
>>>
>>> ==================== Summary ====================
>>>
>>> Name: SMLoader-fbs.78
>>> Author: fbs
>>> Time: 9 January 2013, 12:55:26.488 pm
>>> UUID: affd02cf-4ff4-4bd1-a33f-89ce0d974bf5
>>> Ancestors: SMLoader-cmm.77
>>>
>>> The UI part of supporting multiple Squeak versions in an SM release.
>>>
>>> Todo: POSTing the multiple versions.
>>>
>>> =============== Diff against SMLoader-cmm.77 ===============
>>
>> I would love to know what I need to do to implement POSTing a release
>> with multiple Squeak versions. SqueakMap gurus?
>>
>> frank
>>
>