On 7/4/13, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
> I see no reason ColorTheme should have any abstract methods (defined
> as subclassResponsibility) instead of simply a default color of some
> kind.

+1

 In fact, if we would just give it some state (with default
> values) instead of only methods, perhaps even Smallland would no
> longer need the subclasses.
>
> I think we should give ColorTheme some state (perhaps a Dictionary of
> key->value pairs so it can be flexible with Themes that may want to
> specify one or two additional colorizable attributes).
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Does anyone have a ColorTheme that does NOT subclass SmallLandColorTheme?
>>
>> I'm looking to set ColorTheme current to something that doesn't
>> reference a SmallLand thing.
>>
>> frank
>>
>
>