[squeak-dev] SS3 canary question

Levente Uzonyi leves at elte.hu
Sat Jul 6 16:23:36 UTC 2013


On Sat, 6 Jul 2013, Dale K. Henrichs wrote:

>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> | From: "Tobias Pape" <Das.Linux at gmx.de>
> | To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers list" <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
> | Sent: Friday, July 5, 2013 1:14:21 AM
> | Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] SS3 canary question
> |
> | >
> | > Also, I recall you saying you'd be willing to install a new SS3
> | > image for source.squeak.org. I hope that's still the case.
> |
> | Yes. I would think making that GemStone based would be great.
> | However, GemStones Monticello still misses Script (preamble,
> | postscript, …)
> | and so the default Update-mechanism could be broken. That's why I did
> | not yet take action.
> |
>
> Presumably the missing Script bit can be addressed without too much trouble ...  are written with e WideStrings ...

There are also other extensions written by Bert on source.squeak.org. IMHO 
source.squeak.org is pretty stable, so it's not something I'd replace in 
the first place. squeaksource.com is the site which needs to be replaced 
ASAP. AFAIK it hasn't been updated in the past 5 years.


Levente

>
> Dale
>
>


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list