On 17 July 2013 16:01, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
> So you want to have a bunch of 3-method micro-packages like Pharo, so
> that when you open Monticello and see 257 packages and also it's a
> pain in the ass to define configuration scripts because of this?

I didn't know that a simple recategorisation would get such a hot response!

Even if I did rip Compression apart - which it seems now that I don't
need to do - you would neither know nor care about it in your
configuration scripts unless you were doing something highly
specialised like making a near-minimal image.

And if you _were_ making such a special image, I suspect you'd _want_
such precise control.

But when you've read my other mail you'll see it's a fool's errand to
try split Compression into Compression-Archives and
Compression-Streams because you'd just have a cyclic dependency
between the two. I'm trying to remove _all_ cyclic dependencies.

frank

> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 3:53 AM,  <commits at source.squeak.org> wrote:
>> Frank Shearar uploaded a new version of Compression to project The Trunk:
>> http://source.squeak.org/trunk/Compression-fbs.37.mcz
>>
>> ==================== Summary ====================