On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com>wrote:

> On 20 July 2013 18:09, tim Rowledge <tim at rowledge.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 20-07-2013, at 9:36 AM, Bob Arning <arning315 at comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >> When I see longer ways of saying something replacing shorter ways, I
> always wonder if the perceived benefit has been realized. Are there success
> stories out there for "SmalltalkImage current" enabling something cool that
> "Smalltalk" could not?
> >
> > IIRC the original idea was that SystemDictionary was overloaded with
> nothing-to-do-with-dictionary methods and needed to go on a diet. I don't
> recall it being suggested that the smarter thing would have been to remove
> the *dictionary* stuff and put that somewhere else to use as an environment
> for compiling, leaving the useful system management methods attached to
> something called 'Smalltalk'. I really don't like the current (sic) setup
> where there is SmalltalkImage SystemNavigation and Smalltalk and probably
> other split out stuff I haven't even found.
> >
> > Time for re-unification.
>
> I'm actually in favour of _more_ splitting out. Having a one-stop-shop
> reference for all your everythings means loads of things referencing
> the one-stop shop. That makes modularity difficult.
>
> However, a possible resolution of the Tim vs Frank Paradox is to move
> SmalltalkImage into Kernel, and have other packages _extend_
> SmalltalkImage. Instead of "SystemNavigation default" you'd have
> "Smalltalk organizer", and so on.
>
> Having said that, we have bigger fish to fry. It's easy for us to
> bicker over the colour of the bikeshed, but we should really be
> spending our time beating on Environments and making the tools work
> correctly with same.
>
> So I'd just like to ask one thing. Is everyone happy with changing
> "SmalltalkImage current" references to "Smalltalk"?


+1


> Doing so makes my
> job of decreasing coupling between packages much easier, because every
> SmalltalkImage reference I remove is one less dependency on
> System-Support. (It might also be more Environmentally friendly!)
>
> frank
>
> > tim
> > --
> > tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
> > Klingon Code Warrior:- 6) "Our competitors are without honor!"
> >
> >
> >
>
>


-- 
best,
Eliot
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20130724/9e42ea8b/attachment.htm