[squeak-dev] Block argument syntax
Chris Muller
asqueaker at gmail.com
Fri Mar 1 15:48:48 UTC 2013
> I know this is true for a number of Smalltalk implementations. I found it
> very surprising also. Someone I worked with always formatted their code
> this way. He said it made it easier to double click and highlight the
> variable. I wasn't sure that was enough reason to do it but he did.
So, score +1 for ": x" but ":x" is still left with a score of 0. What
is the advantage of writing ":x"?
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|