On 2013-03-05, at 02:40, Colin Putney <colin at wiresong.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Igor Stasenko <siguctua at gmail.com> wrote:
>  
>> you mean changing compiler to compile
>> "<obj> Foo" message send for accessing Foo name, instead of direct
>> binding access?
>> 
> Oh, I see. The source code still reads as a variable access, but the bytecode implements a message send.

No, I think Igor is proposing to write something like "self environment Foo" to access Foo. Which is flexible, granted, but looks ugly.

- Bert -