On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>wrote:

> On 2013-03-05, at 21:39, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Paul DeBruicker <pdebruic at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Following Bert's instructions I've made a new 4.4 all-in-one and put it
>> here:
>>
>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4460862/Squeak-4.4-All-in-One.zip
>>
>> It uses the same VM as the 4.3 all-in-one.  Should the 4.4 all-in-one
>> have a different VM and if so, which one for each platform?  If you give
>> me links to the VMs  I will attempt to put them in the 4.4 all-in-one I
>> made.
>>
>
> Can you make one with Interpreter VMs and one with Cog VMs (in which case
> use the most up-to-date VMs on my site)?
>
>
> A Squeak release should use Squeak icons. That's a non-issue on Linux,
> easy enough on the Mac, but for Windows we would need to build a new .exe,
> I believe? Has someone tested either Cog or the interpreter on Windows 8 -
> does it work?
>

I can rebrand the Cog VMs as Squeak.  You think I should do that?


>
> Also, I don't see the value in shipping two All-in-ones. If we decide to
> switch to Cog then that should be it.
>

Makes sense to me.  The Interpreter VMs can now load Cog-saved images,
right David?



> An independent issue is what to do about Linux 64 bits.
>
> - Bert -
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
best,
Eliot
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20130305/600000b9/attachment.htm