On 2013-03-07, at 23:54, Louis LaBrunda <Lou at Keystone-Software.com> wrote:

> Hi Bert and Minecraft Lovers,
> 
>>> Bert seems to like pool but also
>>> thought instance methods would be good.  Someone also said they would
>>> prefer class side methods.  I could go with the pool dictionary I have (I
>>> fixed the initialize as you suggested, thanks) and add class methods to
>>> create the instance/class methods and let people run them if they like.
>> 
>> That would be an idea. If you generate them into a "*generated" category they won't even make the package dirty.
> 
> I created two SS3 "Minecraft Constants" and "Minecraft Constants Demo".  I
> added you (Bert) as an administrator, I hope I haven't overstepped in doing
> so.  I think you can remove yourself if you like.

Why didn't you just publish into my existing repo?! It's open exactly for that purpose:

http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/minecraft.html

(also, I couldn't find your repos, ss3 times out when I search for them)

- Bert -


> The "Minecraft Constants" project contains the MinecraftConstants pool
> dictionary class.  The class comment explains how to use it.  I added a
> class method that will create instance and class side methods, depending on
> how you call it, also explained in the class comment.  These methods are
> categories based upon how they are used in Minecraft (at least according to
> Alex).  Once created the MinecraftConstants pool dictionary is no longer
> needed.
> 
> The "Minecraft Constants Demo" project contains MinecraftPoolDemo class to
> show how to use the pool dictionary or the instance/class methods that can
> be generated.  I used the #rainbow: method as a model.
> 
> Have fun!
> 
> Lou
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> Louis LaBrunda
> Keystone Software Corp.
> SkypeMe callto://PhotonDemon
> mailto:Lou at Keystone-Software.com http://www.Keystone-Software.com
> 
>