On 2013-03-12, at 15:59, Colin Putney <colin at wiresong.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
>  
> Isn't #value too general to serve as a specially treated token in the decompiler? It might easily appear in code.
> 
> AFAICT, the decompiler should special case a send of #value *to a binding*, not just any send of #value. There's no way to refer directly to a binding with regular Smalltalk code, right?

Ah. Well, I guess it would be the first time the decompiler behavior depends on the *kind* of literal stored, but then, maybe that's not so bad. Being able to just use #value would be nice indeed.

- Bert -