It's not clear what you are asking. Dictionaries have long had methods 
like #associationAt:. One would want to be careful using such methods, 
but they do seem to be *public*, however fuzzy that distinction might be.

Cheers,
Bob

On 5/14/13 11:42 AM, Chris Muller wrote:
>> It's enough to change the key of the association to a different object.
> True but that would be circumventing the public API of the Dictionary
> would it not?  Is there any path through the API where one obtains
> such access to the underlying Associations?
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20130514/6739122b/attachment.htm