On 3 November 2013 00:41, H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think this shows the need to copy a somewhat stable version from
> (system integrity is fine again after a series of commits) from
>
>      http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/
>
> to
>
>     http://ftp.squeak.org/4.5alpha/
>
> For convenience. Last one is June 2013.

Until the current issue around tests is resolved (the hanging that
might be happening in the Monticello tests: see recent mails on the
topic), we can't release anything from CI. I can't reproduce the
problem on my Windows machine.

But otherwise, yes, ideally the ReleaseSqueakTrunk job would, on a
successful build, give us something we could manually vet and then
publish on ftp.squeak.org.

frank

> Edgar did this in the past for earlier versions.
>
> --Hannes
>
>
> P.S. And the existence of
>       http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/
>
> should be announced from time to time or be easy to spot on www.squeak.org
>
>
>
>
> On 11/2/13, Edgar J. De Cleene <edgardec2005 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> El 11/2/13, 5:46 PM, "Chris Muller" <asqueaker at gmail.com> escribió:
>>
>>>Edgar, what is this?
>>>
>>>I think your subject line could confuse people by appearing to be an
>>>ANNouncement of an "official" release of Squeak.
>>>
>>>Just to be clear, Squeak 4.5 is not released.  This might just be an
>>>updated trunk image..?
>>
>> Try to clarify.
>>
>> People on my group who attend Smalltalks2013 complains about updating to
>> last trunk raise some Monticello windows.
>> So as I follow trunk closely for my use is easier to me made a hand
>> updated .image.
>> I do not claim this is ³official².
>> I said should be the same as CI builds as I do no put any different.
>>
>> Sorry if I so some wrongŠ
>>
>> Edgar
>>
>>
>>
>>
>