On 19 November 2013 21:33, Tony Garnock-Jones <tonyg at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> On 11/19/2013 04:29 PM, Frank Shearar wrote:
>> (Also, NaCl is... odd, in that you get a specific binary built for
>> your platform. There's no generic build.)
>
> This is true of djb's distribution, but not of libsodium. (My
> Crypto-NaCl package uses the FFI to interface with libsodium.)
>
> The libsodium repackaging of NaCl is much friendlier and satisfies
> people's usual autotools-style expectations.

Did you just say "I'll set up a CI job to run its tests"? I'm sure you did!

> Cheers,
>   Tony
>