It's always hairy messing with the Config stuff since the update
process also depends on it.

Thanks for persevering and getting it right.

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 21 November 2013 21:33, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sorry guys.
>>
>> MonticelloConfigurations-fbs.118's postscript references a
>> non-existent class. How do I fix this mess? I pushed a new version 119
>> with the correct postscript, and a new update-fbs.266 which references
>> version 119. I'd hoped that would be sufficient, but not.
>>
>> One option might be to delete 118 & 119, and re-issue a new 120 that's
>> not broken?
>
> Wow, that was dumb. Updating the config map's the right answer, but
> seriously, I need to get some sleep or something. Three versions of a
> package to get something right is two too many.
>
> frank
>