On 22.11.2013, at 10:22, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni at gmail.com> wrote:

> so the conclusion was the the process for the pharo-vm is not a match?

Using the pharo-vm process would be the easiest start, and the most
unifying one, to be frank.
  Tho I'd do it different, but I am not doing a thing there, I'd say
lets go for it.

Best
	-Tobias

> 
> On 2013-11-22, at 04:11, tim Rowledge <tim at rowledge.org> wrote:
>> So, how’s the bounty Hunting going? Been a bit quiet.
>> 
>> I see the cleanups for the plugin code arrangement and they are good. I think. I’d really like to see the full solution to my problem sometime soon so I can send MONEY to someone. Just think of it; $1000 will get you a nice iPad Air and plenty left over to fill it with books or music or apps.
>> 
>> Or, if it turns out a bunch of people get together to solve the problem, I can happily split the dosh, or even make it a donation to squeak foundation or pharo foundation as appropriate.
>> 
>> tim
>> --
>> tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
>> Useful Latin Phrases:- Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam 
>> = I have a catapult. Give me all the money, or I will fling an enormous rock at your head.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1665 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20131122/712ec556/signature.pgp