[squeak-dev] LRUCache to Balloon?

David T. Lewis lewis at mail.msen.com
Fri Nov 22 18:34:00 UTC 2013


> On 22 Nov 2013, at 16:58, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> Yes, you are right there.
>>> I would think, spinning of a new, small package would be a good
>>> compromise?
>>
>> For THREE METHODS?  My God, PLEASE, no!
>
> Bingo! :) But seriously, why do you even care about the number of
packages in the image?
>

Because package categories exist for the benefit of human beings who want
to be able to read and understand the system.

Dave




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list