On 29 November 2013 21:51, tim Rowledge <tim at rowledge.org> wrote:
>
> On 29-11-2013, at 12:43 PM, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> inherentSelectorForGetter
> That’s absolutely a Symbol method and really ought always have been there.

It wasn't clear to me either from the senders-of or the implementation
whether it should go on Symbol or String, so I went with the
broader/safer option, and put it on String.

But I take it you're voting for "put it on the dang object" option
rather than "monkey patching is evil"?

frank

> tim
> --
> tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
> Useful random insult:- In serious need of attitude adjustment.