Morphic right from the start? As far as these change set go Morphic is 
there, but they represent additions to Squeak 1.31. Not sure about 
earlier versions. So the question is

Was there ever a version of Squeak without Morphic? Jecel, you know?

Cheers,
Bob


On 10/26/13 3:04 PM, H. Hirzel wrote:
> Interesting view, Bob.
>
> Clearly visible is when the idea of testing started to get track, when
> Monticello and Etoys arrived.
>
> Morphic seems to be there right from the start. Is that so?
>
> --Hannes
>
> On 10/26/13, Bob Arning <arning315 at comcast.net> wrote:
>> OK, first iteration of the graphical view is at
>>
>> http://69.251.218.6:9116/time
>>
>> each column represents 200 change sets. The numbers in each cell are
>> number of chunks and number of bytes.
>>
>> I'll clean this up a bit later.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Bob
>>
>> On 10/26/13 8:42 AM, H. Hirzel wrote:
>>> On 10/26/13, Bob Arning <arning315 at comcast.net> wrote:
>>>> http://69.251.218.6:9116/ can give you a pretty good picture of the
>>>> evolution in this area.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Bob
>>> Bob
>>>
>>> does it contain _all_ the change sets from 1998 - 2008? It seems that
>>> in 2008 the update mechanism was changed to Monticello files, right?
>>>
>>>
>>> Did you think it would be possible of running an  from 0001 to 7179,
>>> so to say "replaying the evolution"?
>>>
>>> It would be nice to have a graphical display of which areas have been
>>> touched and which ones not. Possibly in the form of a movie.... (e.g.
>>> a rectangle representing a class category sized according to code size
>>> with colors indicating changes, animated gif?)
>>>
>>> --Hannes
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 0001tk_test.doit
>>> "Just a test if the update broadcasting is working"
>>> Transcript show: ' You got an external update'; cr.
>>>
>>> 0002tk_collapse_RF.cs
>>> 'From Squeak 1.31 of Feb 4, 1998 on 8 May 1998 at 4:31:32 pm'
>>>
>>> .........
>>>
>>>
>>> 7179AdvanceTo3dot10dot2.cs
>>> >From Squeak3.10.2beta of 5 June 2008 [latest update: #7175] on 5 June
>>> 2008 at 2:53:19 pm'
>>>
>>>
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20131026/6b069c48/attachment.htm