Munging around with old mailing lists sounds like work. ;-)

What I have done is to take each of the old changes files, subtract the 
previous changes file and treat the result as if it were a single 
update. These files will be identified as '**v1' '*113' '*115' etc so 
that they will sort better.

This is now available on the /diffs page:

http://69.251.218.6:9116/diffs

I'll see about adding this data to the /browse and /time pages.

Cheers,
Bob

sample:



rootForGrabOf:

*119
rootForGrabOf: aMorph
     "Like root, but can be overridden by a morph that wants to allow 
its submorphs to be extracted just by picking them up."

     (owner = nil or: [owner isWorldOrHandMorph]) ifTrue: [? self].
     owner allowSubmorphExtraction
         ifTrue: [? self]
         ifFalse: [? owner rootForGrabOf: aMorph].

*131
rootForGrabOf: aMorph
     "Like root, but can be overridden by a morph that wants to allow 
its submorphs to be extracted just by picking them up."

     (owner = nil or: [owner isWorldOrHandMorph]) ifTrue: [? self].
     owner allowSubmorphExtraction
         ifTrue: [? self]
         ifFalse: [? owner rootForGrabOf: aMorph].
     "Be sticky if sticky property is set. Normally this would be 
recompiled in the unique subclass of each morph, so this is a backstop 
only, and for development."
     ? self isSticky
         ifTrue:
             [nil]
         ifFalse:
             [(owner = nil or: [owner isWorldOrHandMorph])
                 ifTrue:
                     [self]
                 ifFalse:
                     [owner allowSubmorphExtraction
                         ifTrue: [self]
                         ifFalse: [owner rootForGrabOf: aMorph]]]


0149Flood-sw.cs
rootForGrabOf: aMorph
     "Be sticky if sticky property is set. Normally this would be 
recompiled in the unique subclass of each morph, so this is a backstop 
only, and for development."
     ? self isSticky
     ? (self isSticky and: [self isPartsDonor not])
         ifTrue:
             [nil]
         ifFalse:
             [(owner = nil or: [owner isWorldOrHandMorph])
                 ifTrue:
                     [self]
                 ifFalse:
                     [owner allowSubmorphExtraction
                         ifTrue: [self]
                         ifFalse: [owner rootForGrabOf: aMorph]]]

2776TruthAndBeauty.cs
rootForGrabOf: aMorph
     self flag: #arNote. "TODO: Remove the entire rootForGrabOf: logic"
     ? (self isSticky and: [self isPartsDonor not])
         ifTrue:
             [nil]
         ifFalse:
             [(owner = nil or: [owner isWorldOrHandMorph])
                 ifTrue:
                     [self]
                 ifFalse:
                     [owner allowSubmorphExtraction
                         ifTrue: [self]
                         ifFalse: [owner rootForGrabOf: aMorph]]]

2783DnD-Day.cs
rootForGrabOf: aMorph
     self flag: #arNote. "TODO: Remove the entire rootForGrabOf: logic"
     ? (self isSticky and: [self isPartsDonor not])
         ifTrue:
             [nil]
         ifFalse:
             [(owner = nil or: [owner isWorldOrHandMorph])
                 ifTrue:
                     [self]
                 ifFalse:
                     [owner allowSubmorphExtraction
                         ifTrue: [self]
                         ifFalse: [owner rootForGrabOf: aMorph]]]
** explicitly removed **

On 10/27/13 2:53 PM, Jecel Assumpcao Jr. wrote:
> Bob Arning wrote:
>
>> Morphic right from the start? As far as these change set go Morphic is
>> there, but they represent additions to Squeak 1.31. Not sure about
>> earlier versions. So the question is
>>
>> Was there ever a version of Squeak without Morphic? Jecel, you know?
> Juan has already replied that Morphic was added to 1.19 (the versions I
> remember before that were 1.13, 1.16, 1.17 and 1.18). Note that even
> 1.31 started up in a MVC project and you had to open a new Morphic one
> to play around with that. This was inverted in 2.0, I think.
>
> One issue is that 1998 is not "the start" at all. You might think that
> not much is missing when you lack under two years, but it is important
> to remember that the rate of development of the Squeak project was
> amazing in the beginning compared to what we are now used to. That is
> actually common for a low of projects. So one version doesn't have
> networking at all, and then next you have a web browser that tries to
> play Flash pages.
>
> In terms of lines of code, on the other hand, the rate of development
> got faster as time went on rather than slower. This isn't so obvious if
> you do some statistics on the various images because there were several
> times when a lot of code was removed from the official images. So if you
> look at one image and it has 40% more classes/methods/lines of code than
> an older one but the older one can sing "Silent Night" and the new one
> can't, then the number is smaller than it should be.
>
> Sam Adam asked about extending this back in time (I guess it would have
> to be through Apple Smalltalk-80 and then back through Xerox Smalltalks)
> and I mentioned a two year gap. It might be a neat idea to convert the
> earlier changes into the same format (a lot of the needed information
> can be found in the archives for this mailing list) and number them -1,
> -2, etc...
>
> -- Jecel
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20131027/07feafa6/attachment-0001.htm