[squeak-dev] A Bounty for CMake-ifying stack/Cog vm build process

Igor Stasenko siguctua at gmail.com
Thu Oct 31 20:43:51 UTC 2013


On 31 October 2013 21:38, tim Rowledge <tim at rowledge.org> wrote:

>
> On 31-10-2013, at 1:21 PM, Igor Stasenko <siguctua at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Are you aware that you asking for something which already done and
> exists?
>
> It’s not already done; it isn’t what is included by Ian on squeakvm,org
> nor eliot on … wherever. If you can convince both of them that it should
> be, then you win the bounty. I’m not actually much interested in details
> here; just the result of getting the plain interpreter code on
> squeakvm.org (which is currently an SVN repository not git) and Eliot’s
> code (also on squeakvm.org) built by substantially the same mechanism.
>
>
ah. you also want vanilla squeak VM built by that..
well, originally CMakeVMMaker was envisioned to support that.
but it was never tried/done, yet it is certainly doable ( and again at a
fraction of effort
comparing to doing everything from scratch).

But no, i'm not going to run for a bounty nor attempt to convince anyone to
use/build on top of CMakeVMMaker (apparently because i tried this before
and failed).



> tim
> --
> tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
> May the bugs of many programs nest on your hard drive.
>
>
>
>


-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20131031/9411d6c7/attachment.htm


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list