Right. That version's somewhere around 300 commits behind Trunk. After
you update the image (open the Squeak menu in the docking bar at the
top, on the far left), you will find only ReleaseBuilder.

You always have local storage available, in the form of an
MCCacheRepository pointing to the /your/image/path/package-cache/
directory.

We really ought to push out a more up-to-date image, which requires me
to finish finding out why the continuous integration update-image.st
script is broken.

frank

On 12 September 2013 17:22, gettimothy <gettimothy at zoho.com> wrote:
> Good news on the trunk!
>
> I am confused by what you mean by 'There is no ReleaseBuilderForXdotY'.
>
> I went here: http://ftp.squeak.org/trunk/
>
> Downloaded the .image and .change, then copied over an existing cogvm,
> sources and stuff, fired up and browsing
> ReleaseBuilder --> show hierarchy yields:
>
> ProtoObject #()
>     Object #()
>         Behavior #('superclass' 'methodDict' 'format')
>             ClassDescription #('instanceVariables' 'organization')
>                 Class #('subclasses' 'name' 'classPool' 'sharedPools'
> 'environment' 'category')
>                     ProtoObject class #()
>                         Object class #()
>
>                             ReleaseBuilder class #()
>                                 ReleaseBuilderDeveloper class #()
>                                 ReleaseBuilderFor3dot10 class #('current')
>                                     ReleaseBuilderFor3dot11 class #()
>                                 ReleaseBuilderFor4dot3 class #()
>                                 ReleaseBuilderFor4dot4 class #()
>                                 ReleaseBuilderFor4dot5 class #()
>                                 ReleaseBuilderNihongo class #()
>                                 ReleaseBuilderSqueakland class #()
>
> Since this is the 4.5 release series, I was poking around in the
> ReleaseBuilderFor4.5 to see if I could solve the image issue for you guys.
> ReleaseBuilderFor4dot5 class>>prepareNewBuild hung when it tried to put my
> (ahem) work up on trunk.
>
> It was then, I thought I should modify
> ReleaseBuilderFor4dot5>>releaseRepository to store my work locally.
>
> If people commonly do that, I would like to mirror that style to keep things
> consistent.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---- On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 07:21:23 -0700 Frank
> Shearar<frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote ----
>
> On 12 September 2013 14:00, gettimothy <gettimothy at zoho.com> wrote:
>> Is there a best-practice for fiddling with ReleaseBuilderForXdotY ?
>>
>> I downloaded the latest trunk image so I could look at the recent
>> background
>> image issue and, after running ReleaseBuilderFor4dot5
>> class>>prepareNewBuild
>> discovered that it uses MCHttpRepository to upload to the
>> source.squeak.org/trunk.
>>
>> I was going to play around with MCFileBasedRepository to save locally, but
>> decided to ask the list first.
>>
>> Also, my apologies if I accidently clobbered /trunk
>
> There is no ReleaseBuilderForXdotY. There is only ReleaseBuilder.
> (Imagine that in a voice from Ghostbusters.)
>
> You probably won't be able to clobber trunk. Or, if you did, it's an
> administrator who's to blame, because only a few folk have commit
> rights to Trunk. (Unlike Inbox, which is world-writable.)
>
> frank
>
>
>
>
>