On 21 September 2013 18:14, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
> Name-resolution does not seem to be the issue.  NetNameResolver
> produces a SocketAddress whose printString pretty much matches what I
> get using "host" on the linux command-line.
>
> The issue is that Squeak is unable to use its own SocketAddress
> representation to make the connection.  And it reports this error from
> the VM:
>
>    sqConnectToAddressSize: Address family not supported by protocol
>
> Does anyone know what that means?

Well, the error is quite clear, or would be if the error told us which
"address family" and "protocol" were involved. What does strace tell
you?

frank

> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:21 PM, tim Rowledge <tim at rowledge.org> wrote:
>> All I can think of for now is to try some non-squeak resolver type tools and at least get evidence as to whether it's them or us.
>>
>> tim
>> --
>> tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
>> Useful random insult:- Has an inferiority complex, but not a very good one.
>>
>>
>>
>