> To partly answer my own question, I just noticed that
> Envelope>computeValueAtMSecs: is only sent by Envelope>sustainEnd:
> and thus that first clause must always get skipped (because we always
> call it with loopEndMSecs== nil) and so surely we’d be ok to delete
> that bit and not mess around with the ‘pretend to be sustaining’
> stuff?

     I agree.


-C

--
Craig Latta
netjam.org
+31   6 2757 7177 (SMS ok)
+ 1 415  287 3547 (no SMS)