On 09.12.2014, at 15:02, Craig Latta <craig at netjam.org> wrote:

>> Do your pool references end up being valid?
> 
>     Aha, the answer is no. So, I had to put some things in a separate
> package which must be loaded first. Among those things is a change
> required by a remote-object-aware version of
> IdentityDictionary>>scanFor:; the system was crashing when they were
> loaded in the wrong order.
> 

I recall the pool-before-something pattern from
FFI, where we first have to load a pool package
and then the actual classes.

Best
	-Tobias