[squeak-dev] FloatConstants?

Bert Freudenberg bert at freudenbergs.de
Mon Dec 22 09:59:23 UTC 2014


On 22.12.2014, at 00:13, Levente Uzonyi <leves at elte.hu> wrote:
> 
> ConverterFloatArray at: 1 put: self; basicAt: 1.

Any reason not to use this in #asIEEE32BitWord? Endianness? Arch-dependency?

I see, it's not thread-safe. This would be:

	(FloatArray new: 1) at: 1 put: self; basicAt: 1.

Might still be faster?

- Bert -


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4142 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20141222/6909a36d/smime.bin


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list