[squeak-dev] Re: The Inbox: Monticello-topa.585.mcz
Bert Freudenberg
bert at freudenbergs.de
Mon Jan 27 11:41:43 UTC 2014
On 27.01.2014, at 12:27, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
> On 27.01.2014, at 12:06, Stephan Eggermont <stephan at stack.nl> wrote:
>
>> Chris wrote:
>>> Each of my own application instances has its own SharedObjects
>>> container. It's just a simple wrapper of some IdentityDictionary's,
>>> one for Dates, one for literals (incl. Strings). This way, each
>>> object belongs in its own persistent domain, and remaining a String to
>>> avoid being forced to be shared across persistent domains.
>>>
>>> We should not let any one app bloat the SymbolTable (which can slow
>>> down the system for ALL apps) merely for this purpose. If we want to
>>> address this data redundancy, we should do so explicitly in the app
>>> (MC). This is a recurring issue we should address it with a reusable
>>> first-class SharedObjectsContainer (or something else acceptable).
>>
>> Ha, that’s the kind of comments I was hoping for. Thanks Tobias for
>> pushing this. An application specific value object cache makes sense.
>>
>> Stephan
>>
>>
>
> May we schedule this for 4.6?
>
> Best
> -Tobias
MC already re-uses MCDefinitions, with a special cache. Generalizing this sounds like a Good Idea.
- Bert -
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4142 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20140127/72e961f4/smime.bin
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|