[squeak-dev] Re: The Inbox: Monticello-topa.585.mcz
Frank Shearar
frank.shearar at gmail.com
Mon Jan 27 13:17:35 UTC 2014
On 27 January 2014 11:27, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
>
> On 27.01.2014, at 12:06, Stephan Eggermont <stephan at stack.nl> wrote:
>
>> Chris wrote:
>>> Each of my own application instances has its own SharedObjects
>>> container. It's just a simple wrapper of some IdentityDictionary's,
>>> one for Dates, one for literals (incl. Strings). This way, each
>>> object belongs in its own persistent domain, and remaining a String to
>>> avoid being forced to be shared across persistent domains.
>>>
>>> We should not let any one app bloat the SymbolTable (which can slow
>>> down the system for ALL apps) merely for this purpose. If we want to
>>> address this data redundancy, we should do so explicitly in the app
>>> (MC). This is a recurring issue we should address it with a reusable
>>> first-class SharedObjectsContainer (or something else acceptable).
>>
>> Ha, that’s the kind of comments I was hoping for. Thanks Tobias for
>> pushing this. An application specific value object cache makes sense.
>>
>> Stephan
>>
>>
>
> May we schedule this for 4.6?
Sounds like a good idea. Would you mind updating
http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/6192 accordingly?
frank
> Best
> -Tobias
>
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|