[squeak-dev] Re: The Inbox: Monticello-topa.585.mcz

Frank Shearar frank.shearar at gmail.com
Mon Jan 27 13:17:35 UTC 2014


On 27 January 2014 11:27, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
>
> On 27.01.2014, at 12:06, Stephan Eggermont <stephan at stack.nl> wrote:
>
>> Chris wrote:
>>> Each of my own application instances has its own SharedObjects
>>> container.  It's just a simple wrapper of some IdentityDictionary's,
>>> one for Dates, one for literals (incl. Strings).  This way, each
>>> object belongs in its own persistent domain, and remaining a String to
>>> avoid being forced to be shared across persistent domains.
>>>
>>> We should not let any one app bloat the SymbolTable (which can slow
>>> down the system for ALL apps) merely for this purpose.  If we want to
>>> address this data redundancy, we should do so explicitly in the app
>>> (MC).  This is a recurring issue we should address it with a reusable
>>> first-class SharedObjectsContainer (or something else acceptable).
>>
>> Ha, that’s the kind of comments I was hoping for. Thanks Tobias for
>> pushing this. An application specific value object cache makes sense.
>>
>> Stephan
>>
>>
>
> May we schedule this for 4.6?

Sounds like a good idea. Would you mind updating
http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/6192 accordingly?

frank

> Best
>         -Tobias
>
>
>


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list