On 27.01.2014, at 14:17, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 27 January 2014 11:27, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
>> 
>> On 27.01.2014, at 12:06, Stephan Eggermont <stephan at stack.nl> wrote:
>> 
>>> Chris wrote:
>>>> Each of my own application instances has its own SharedObjects
>>>> container.  It's just a simple wrapper of some IdentityDictionary's,
>>>> one for Dates, one for literals (incl. Strings).  This way, each
>>>> object belongs in its own persistent domain, and remaining a String to
>>>> avoid being forced to be shared across persistent domains.
>>>> 
>>>> We should not let any one app bloat the SymbolTable (which can slow
>>>> down the system for ALL apps) merely for this purpose.  If we want to
>>>> address this data redundancy, we should do so explicitly in the app
>>>> (MC).  This is a recurring issue we should address it with a reusable
>>>> first-class SharedObjectsContainer (or something else acceptable).
>>> 
>>> Ha, that’s the kind of comments I was hoping for. Thanks Tobias for
>>> pushing this. An application specific value object cache makes sense.
>>> 
>>> Stephan
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> May we schedule this for 4.6?
> 
> Sounds like a good idea. Would you mind updating
> http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/6192 accordingly?

Can I?

Best
	-Tobias

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1665 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20140127/ca234cce/signature.pgp