[squeak-dev] Re: The Inbox: Monticello-topa.585.mcz
Chris Cunningham
cunningham.cb at gmail.com
Mon Jan 27 15:49:02 UTC 2014
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
>
> On 27.01.2014, at 14:34, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 27 January 2014 13:25, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 27.01.2014, at 14:17, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 27 January 2014 11:27, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 27.01.2014, at 12:06, Stephan Eggermont <stephan at stack.nl> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Chris wrote:
> >>>>>> Each of my own application instances has its own SharedObjects
> >>>>>> container. It's just a simple wrapper of some IdentityDictionary's,
> >>>>>> one for Dates, one for literals (incl. Strings). This way, each
> >>>>>> object belongs in its own persistent domain, and remaining a String
> to
> >>>>>> avoid being forced to be shared across persistent domains.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We should not let any one app bloat the SymbolTable (which can slow
> >>>>>> down the system for ALL apps) merely for this purpose. If we want
> to
> >>>>>> address this data redundancy, we should do so explicitly in the app
> >>>>>> (MC). This is a recurring issue we should address it with a
> reusable
> >>>>>> first-class SharedObjectsContainer (or something else acceptable).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ha, that’s the kind of comments I was hoping for. Thanks Tobias for
> >>>>> pushing this. An application specific value object cache makes sense.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Stephan
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> May we schedule this for 4.6?
> >>>
> >>> Sounds like a good idea. Would you mind updating
> >>> http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/6192 accordingly?
> >>
> >> Can I?
> >
> > I'm confused: are you asking for permission? ("yes, of course, since
> > you're a member of the Squeak community, and the 4.6 list of requests
> > is for everyone") Or are you asking for the ability? (Because you
> > don't know the password.)
>
> The latter :)
>
> Best
> -Tobias
>
> PS: I have up until now never used the swiki…
> Probably we should have a meta-4.6 todo for nicer swiki urls? ;)
>
> The SWIKI already does have a built-in better URL's. Unfortunately, they
don't work with pages that have periods in them (that is,
http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/squeak4.6 goes to the FunSqueak4.2Cog page,
not really what is desired). The 'trick' is to lump all the works from the
title together, with new words being capitalized. It does a scan (or
sorts, obviously) to find the best match. My personal past with this is
that I make several guesses about what will get a good result, and
eventually one works fairly well.
-cbc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20140127/c1d0564d/attachment.htm
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|