[squeak-dev] Re: Should IPv6 be enabled?

Tobias Pape Das.Linux at gmx.de
Wed Jan 29 22:22:12 UTC 2014


On 29.01.2014, at 23:19, Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> 2014-01-29 Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de>
> 
> On 29.01.2014, at 22:12, Chris Muller <ma.chris.m at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > I thought we had it enabled in the 4.4 release, but I just downloaded
> > and checked:  we didn't.
> >
> > So should we enable this at the last second of this release or first
> > second of next release or did it get tested all during this release
> > and its okay?
> >
> 
> Pleas enable it after the release.
> Reasoning is following:
> - We use squeak in class and encourage our students to
> at least try images on their own, hence, they should look into
> the then-to-be-stable 4.5.
> - As pointed out, our squeaksource is primarily advertised in DNS as
> IPv6 (which we cannot and won’t change)
> - If the IPv6 support can produce the spontaneous error as I indicated
> (and have reproduced with other people at HPI), the students would just
> be driven away.
> 
> Best
>         -Tobias
> 
> 
> 
> I confirm, there is a problem (Cog VM MacOS X 10.6.8) as commented on your answer at
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20731665/how-exactly-do-you-build-a-gui-application-in-squeak/20746106#20746106
> 
> Nicolas

Yes.
Config here: OS X 10.9, Cog 2776

Best
	-Tobias

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1665 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20140129/1c79c85f/signature.pgp


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list