On 18.07.2014, at 02:14, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:

> 
> On 17.07.2014, at 21:47, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Tobias,
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> On 17.07.2014, at 02:53, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> > Your patch should work either way.  At the level where a repository retrieves Collections-ul.573 for you, it doesn't care whether its a .mcd or .mcz; the MCVersion object you get with its embedded Snapshot to patch, will have everything as if it were loaded from a mcz..
>> 
>> Are you sure?]\
>> 
>> Chris is right.  Loading the version appears to construct the full package from the patch correctly.  magic ;-) 
> 
> 
> Yep. MCDiffyVersions should behave exactly the same as regular MCVersions. They're just stored in multiple files, not one.

OK, thanks :)
I was concerned as I thought Eliot’s patching acted directly
on the snapshot.bin. Silly me.

Best
	-Tobias
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1625 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20140718/22985a29/signature.pgp