On Jun 14, 2014, at 12:00 PM, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 14 June 2014 17:04, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 13 June 2014 13:44, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 13 June 2014 00:08, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> see http://www.mirandabanda.org/files/Cog/VM/VM.r2987/
>>>> 
>>>> Yay!
>>> 
>>> https://travis-ci.org/squeak-smalltalk/squeak-ci/builds/27566729 <--
>>> Latest Cog passing Travis CI's muster
>>> http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/861/ <-- Latest Cog passing
>>> build.squeak.org's muster
>>> 
>>> (http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/860/ was actually the first
>>> run, but it barfed with that intermittent LargeInteger primitive bug.)
>>> 
>>> Given the inclusion of SSL libs in r3000, does it make sense for me to
>>> still manually install the SqueakSSL plugin from
>>> https://squeakssl.googlecode.com/files/SqueakSSL-bin-0.1.5.zip ?
>> 
>> 
>> If the tests show it is good.  Do they?  Not sure from the CI runs above...
> 
> 11's about the normal number of test failures. Those look like the
> usual suspects. So I'm happy that r3000 + manually installed SqueakSSL
> works. I'm just wondering if I need to do the manual install
> anymore...

I'm hoping not, but there's been very little testing of these latest SSL plugins.    I see no reason why they won't work and of course we want the new ones to work.  Try it and see?

> 
> frank
> 
>> --
>> best,
>> Eliot
>