[squeak-dev] Urgent, Spur users please read,
was: The Inbox: Kernel-kfr.858.mcz
Tobias Pape
Das.Linux at gmx.de
Tue Jun 17 16:39:23 UTC 2014
On 17.06.2014, at 17:35, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> If you're chained to FileBased, it will not work well forever, guaranteed.
>>
>> Again: This is not about files. At all.
>
> Until someone can find the will to propagate that case-logic crap to
> all the other MCRepository types, any user of branches will be
> restricted to FileBased repositories.
>
> But I'm even doubtful that it even CAN be easily brought to all the
> other types because it increases their search/processing burden to
> include scanning for period. That's something that fits right into
> the implementation of the unscalable FileBased system, which is forced
> read entire contents of some ever-growing directory of files to do
> anything.
>
> Since its already incurred the cost of doing that, it's got all of the
> thousands of versions all the way back to version .1 in memory (which
> it never needs, so this is terribly wasteful again and again), and so
> String-scanning every version-name for the branch dot in memory is
> low-cost.
>
> But, in a DB-oriented repository, the DB didn't already have to incur
> unnecessary cost. It uses indexes up front on packageName to access a
> result-set based on only the minimum of what's _needed_ for that
> operation. It's simple, beautiful and efficient. _Maybe_ some kind
> of special-processing index could be rigged-up to serve the
> branch-purpose, but when its so much easier to simply use the
> ancestry, who will ever do that work?
>
> So, that's why I'm saying, for all practical purposes, right now,
> using "branches" = FileBased only.
Branches were always there.
As long as Monticello exists.
It is a naming convention but nevertheless exists.
This has nothing to do with whether file-based MC repos have specialized handling
for it.
Best
-Tobias
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1625 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20140617/add04852/signature.pgp
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|