On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:

>
> On 04.03.2014, at 23:23, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Tobias,
> >
> >>> Chris, please consider this:
> >>>
> >>> My mail from 02.03.2014, at 23:03,
> >
> > --snip--
> >
> > Yes, sorry, I did consider your mail..  A while ago, in fact.
> >
> >
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2014-January/176249.html
> >
> > We did not create new sources since V41 because a couple of us have
> > ideas about what we want that to do.  Eliot has an idea and I,
> > personally, want to avoid "island" releases where each method version
> > is totally alone with no context from its prior version.  I want each
> > release to have the current version for each method, plus the version
> > from the prior release.
> >
> > Sounds like there is some motivation to work on this for 4.6.  We
> > haven't cared about "size" much last few releases but I know it will
> > be a factor in 4.6 or soon thereafter, where we'll address not just
> > .changes but other aspects as well.
>
> Ok, so, when condensing the changes file for the past releases, we lost
> method
> histories, right?
>

If we had done so, yes.  But as I understand it this has not been done.
 For example, if you look at the 4.3 release's changes file you'll see it's
full of droppings for running the TestRunner.


> Best
>         -Tobias
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
best,
Eliot
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20140304/46108440/attachment.htm