Thank you Chris, you mean the old site should still be available in
addition. With a link from the new site referring to it, right?

I think too that would be a good thing to have for some years.

--Hannes

On 3/21/14, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 3:40 PM, H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 3/21/14, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> You know, I just noticed that the new site does not have "What's New"
>>> section.
>>>
>>> What else did the old site have that new site doesn't?  It's hard to
>>> tell, because, unfortunately after having a digital presence on the
>>> web for over a decade, someone arbitrarily took the site down without
>>> warning or discussion.
>>
>> not arbitrary, because there was quite a lot of discussion on and off
>> about the new design during the last 12...18 months.
>>
>> The new site was shown as a test version as well. And people liked it.
>
> Hi Hannes, let me reiterate my compliments about the new site.
>
> But I am not talking about the new site.  I am talking about the OLD
> site, which belongs to the squeak.org community.
>
>