On 25.05.2014, at 22:43, Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> 2014-05-25 18:34 GMT+02:00 Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com>:
> 
> 2014-05-25 2:39 GMT+02:00 Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com>:
> 
> Hi, thanks for noticing and investigating this!  Seeing this now, I
> think we should signal an Error rather than a Warning to be more
> TestCase friendly but also because persisting empty packages is so
> painful, it should be an error, hands down.  Better to force a
> resolution to the issue than silently persist modules of
> future-pain...
> 
> 
> In any case, I think you accidently uncovered bugs in Tests-Monticello.
> I'm looking at a fix for a few hours, and it's really messy.
>  
> 
> Hooray! After publishing Tests-nice.297 there is now a trunk CI job that finished
> http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/857/
> 
> Now we can see we have some regressions...
> How could we live without CI before?
> 
> Of course, for dissecting which change introduced which regression after a 2 month interrupt, that's going to be more pain than necessary...
> 

To not make that happen again, can we make the jenkins mail squeak-dev on
important (read me, not all) information? 
Like:
	more tests fail
	errors
	(possibly one nightly information)

best
	-tobias

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1625 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20140525/69c7f4b9/signature.pgp