On 25.05.2014, at 19:48, David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:

> Performance of the UTC based DateAndTime is generally favorable compared to
> the original. Here is what I see on my system (smaller numbers are better).
> 
> LXTestDateAndTimePerformance test results using the original Squeak DateAndTime
> on an interpreter VM:
> {
> 	#testNow->10143 .
> 	#testEquals->30986 .
> 	#testGreaterThan->80199 .
> 	#testLessThan->75912 .
> 	#testPrintString->10429 .
> 	#testStringAsDateAndTime->44657
> }
> 
> LXTestDateAndTimePerformance test results using the new UTC based DateAndTime
> on an interpreter VM:
> {
> 	#testNow->6423 .
> 	#testEquals->31625 .
> 	#testGreaterThan->22999 .
> 	#testLessThan->18514 .
> 	#testPrintString->12502 .
> 	#testStringAsDateAndTime->32912
> }

Hi Dave,

just curious: did you test the performance without the LargeInt primitives?

- Bert -


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4142 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20140528/9161d534/smime.bin