[squeak-dev] Re: #'insufficient object memory' in Spur

Eliot Miranda eliot.miranda at gmail.com
Fri Nov 14 20:47:22 UTC 2014


On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Chris Muller <ma.chris.m at gmail.com> wrote:

> I was already using the 10/28 image.  Ah ha!  It seems I accidently
> Load'ed that latest System package (unconverted) instead of Merge'ing
> it..  OOPS!  Not my day today!
>

Not your fault.  I will autoupdate immediately.



>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Chris Muller <ma.chris.m at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Eliot, thanks a lot for your help on the CM header.  I decided to
> >> try to add a new bit indicator in my CompiledMethodBuffer (pickled
> >> state of a CM) to indicate which header format it was pickled in so I
> >> can hopefully maintain a heterogeneous environment.
> >>
> >> Now, maybe I goofed up my image while testing it at some point because
> >> I cannot seem to allocate a 50MB ByteString (even though (Smalltalk
> >> vmParameterAt: 3) reports just 89,627,904)
> >>
> >>    String new: 50000000
> >>
> >> causes a failure in primitve 71, which causes the failure code to run,
> >> which sends #growMemoryByAtLeast: to Smalltalk.  But, there are no
> >> implementors of #growMemoryByAtLeast: in the image..!
> >
> >
> > If you download a recent Spur image from my web site you'll find it
> > there-in.
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Do you have an impl. of that method?  This could be a real problem for
> >> me to move to Spur because I absolutely depend on handling OutOfMemory
> >> errors to build my large models..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > best,
> > Eliot
>



-- 
best,
Eliot
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20141114/6155d7ec/attachment.htm


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list