On 04-04-2015, at 3:41 PM, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 4:41 AM, Marcel Taeumel
> <marcel.taeumel at student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de> wrote:
>> Ah, nice scenario! Didn't think of that one.
>> 
>> ...hey! Buy youself a bigger monitor! :P Speaking of that:
>> 
>> For which resolution do we want to optimize Squeak? 800x600? 1024x768? :)
> 
> 800x600.
> 
Really, that small? Are there any devices with screens that small any more? Surely the minimum likely limit is HD tv size, implying to me that a default around 1024x900 would be plausible. 

What reason do you have for going for smaller?


tim
--
tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
If you don't pay the exorcist do you get repossessed?