On 06.04.2015, at 18:59, David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:

>> On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Marcel Taeumel
>> <marcel.taeumel at student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de> wrote:
>>> Hey! :)
>>> 
>>> Can we add both to the update map (somehow?) and see if it works out
>>> during
>>> the following days/weeks until the release?
>> 
>> +1
>> 
> 
> What is the point of moving these into the base image? Aren't these
> exactly the kinds of things that you would want to have maintained as
> independent packages that can be easily loaded from SqueakMap?

I think both these are Extremely Important (capital).
WebClient as replacement for HTTPSocket (it already provides a compatibility
layer; Andreas seemed to always considered WebClient to replace HTTPSocket),
and SqueakSSL because you can't load anything meaningful on the web without
SSL; github, twitter, most sites. And that's good.
Plus we _finally_ could put the Plain Text Passwords for Monticello behind
SSL…

Best
	-Tobias